California Florida Illinois New York Texas

Wyoming Supreme Court favors media in records case

Scales of JusticeThe Wyoming Supreme Court ruled last Tuesday that circuit courts may not exclude the media and public from hearings.

These hearings determine whether the state has enough evidence to justify charging defendants with sexual assault. It is a win for the media, which had challenged a local circuit judge’s refusal to release information about a local man charged with kidnapping and sexual assault of a girl in 2012.

It was found that circuit Judge Vincent Case Jr. had violated the First Amendment when he closed the court proceedings and sealed records from the court before moving the defendant, Robert J. Parks to district court.

Multiple news outlets including the Wyoming Press Association, The Associated Press, Casper Star-Tribune, and several area papers disputed closing the case.

Editor of the Wyoming Star-Tribune, Jason Adrians said he was ecstatic regarding the decision. He continued that it was the right ruling and a victory for transparency in the state of Wyoming.

Wyoming Press Association executive director, Jim Angell said the ruling makes it much easier for journalists to do their job. Angell said that journalists are the guardians of the public’s knowledge of what’s happening around them.

Area chief of bureau for The Associated Press, Jim Clarke said he is pleased the Wyoming Supreme Court has ruled in favor of news media access. He said it is a right that The Associated Press has been fighting for aggressively in courtrooms and halls of power around the country.

Wyoming attorney general, Peter Michael said he had not yet reviewed the court’s opinion and had no immediate comment on it.

Bruce Moats, a lawyer representing the media organizations stated there are several courts in Wyoming had replicated what the judge had done in the Parks’ case. This ruling makes sure a judge cannot seal a case so easily.

The ruling exhibits a constitutional right to access court records in Wyoming. This finding takes Wyoming state law even further than United States Supreme Court rulings on access by a court.

Moats said the Wyoming court system has not been equal in its treatment of cases. The decision gives courts guidance and helps keep the cases open as long as possible.
The Wyoming Supreme Court found that the circuit judges can follow state law forbidding state employees, other than the presiding magistrate, from identifying people accused of sexual assault.

Attorneys of the state can now file papers in circuit court with the defendant’s name represented by initials or completely redacted.

If a judge in the circuit court believes they have a very good reason to withhold public information, they must hold a hearing to give members of the public a chance to argue against the decision.

Judges must now make specific findings on the record about why a hearing was closed to allow higher courts to review the decision.

Parks entered so-called Alford pleas to the charges in May 2013, meaning he did not admit guilt but acknowledged that prosecutors likely had enough evidence to convict him. He was sentenced last August to concurrent sentences of 44 to 50 years for first-degree sexual abuse of a minor and 60 years to life in prison for aggravated kidnapping.

Arizona ordered to hand over death records

GavelArizona health officials have been ordered to hand over detailed records of incidents where mentally ill patients have died while in state care. It is the second time in less than 10 years a judge has made this decision. [Read more...]

Wisconsin reaches compromise over redacted information in police reports

NewspaperThe Wisconsin Newspaper Association and the League of Wisconsin Municipalities reached a settlement this week recommending police release reports without redacting information.

Agencies in Wisconsin have been blacking out records based on what a judge found was a misinformed interpretation of a federal law meant to protect the privacy of driver’s license records. [Read more...]

City in Louisiana fights mysterious records request

Sealed RecordsSmall town or single city-contained drama is the stuff of American folklore. It fuels plot lines for countless TV shows and movies alike, both past and present, and generally presents a storyline we can all relate to on some level. Right now, Mandeville, Louisiana is experiencing its own brand of local drama, and a public records request some are deeming “burdensome” lies right at the heart of it. [Read more...]

Changes coming to Minnesota expungement law

Background CheckFor anyone with a criminal record, finding housing and a job is often the most challenging part of life after completion of the sentence. However, changes are on the way in Minnesota, and they may ease this burden and help individuals with criminal records work their way back into society. [Read more...]

ACLU sues for full disclosure from NEMLEC

GavelIn Boston, Massachusetts, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed a lawsuit against the Northeastern Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council (NEMLEC) for refusing to provide access to public records. The ACLU wants a judge to order NEMLEC to release information that the organization has chosen to block. [Read more...]

All Aboard Florida plagued by a few who aren’t onboard

Train TracksHave you heard of All Aboard Florida? Unless you’re living in one of the locations where the project is taking place, the phrase might not be familiar. But All Aboard isn’t just a phrase, it’s an initiative that is shaping up to become the first privately owned and operated public railway in the United States.

Owned by Florida East Coast Industries, All Aboard is seeking to create a railway between Miami and Orlando, with two more stops along the way in Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach. [Read more...]

Should mugshots be available to the public?

MugshotShould mugshots be matters of public record? In Albany, NY, this is a question that’s come to the forefront of legislative minds. A bill currently on the docket for state lawmakers purports to make mugshots (partially) private matters, rather than automatic parts of public record as they are now. Under the new bill, mugshots would be restricted to only being accessed by the police, court, and criminal investigation organizations processing a case. Once the case was closed, the mugshots would be released to news and media outlets, but only if the person was convicted or if the police were searching for a missing person. [Read more...]